Skip to site navigationSkip to chapter navigationSkip to content
 Commonwealth Ombudsman annual report 2003–2004
 Annual report home | Contents | Userguide | Download | Search | Print page
 Transmittal | Contacting | Foreword | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Team features | Financials | Appendix | References

Contentsright arrowChapter 6 | How the Ombudsman helped peopleright arrowProviding an independent assessment
  

In this chapter

 Introduction
 Helping to resolve complaints in a systematic fashion
 Handling complaints from members of parliament
 Bridging the information gap
 Providing reasons
 Providing an independent assessment
 Facilitating compensation for financial loss
 Oversighting agency investigations

References

Abbreviations and acronyms
Compliance index
Contacts

CHAPTER 6 | how the Ombudsman helped people

Providing an independent assessment

An essential component of the Ombudsman's commitment to the values of independence, impartiality and professionalism is that the office should listen to both sides of a complaint or disagreement. The first step ordinarily taken after a complaint is received is to elicit an agency's response to what a complainant has said, and then to give the complainant a further opportunity to comment. Sometimes the Ombudsman's office is the only body that has been independent of the dispute and has heard both sides. The office is not an advocate for either party.

Maintaining independence and objectivity can be important to the professional resolution of disputes. If complainants can trust that those values have been respected, they are more likely to accept the Ombudsman's explanation for an adverse government decision. Conversely, agencies are more likely to accept our viewpoint on an issue and to acknowledge that a dispute needs to be seen in a different light. The Adequate action case study provides an example.

CASE STUDY

adequate action

Mr A complained that the ATO had not taken adequate action to recover unpaid superannuation contributions from his previous employer.

The relevant legislation prevents the ATO from disclosing to an employee the particulars of any action that the ATO has taken, although the ATO is authorised to provide information to the Ombudsman. It is inappropriate for us to pass on information that is otherwise protected; however, we do seek to satisfy ourselves that action by the ATO is consistent with its guidelines and processes.

In this case, we were able to assure Mr P that, although he had not yet seen any results, we were satisfied that the ATO was taking appropriate action.

Independent assessment of complaints is also the basis of our work within the police jurisdiction, as the Aware of obligations case study demonstrates.

CASE STUDY

aware of obligations

Mr J complained about the conduct of AFP members during a raid on his client's home under the new counter-terrorism laws.

The matter was referred to AFP Internal Investigations. The AFP report concluded that the complaints about the AFP's conduct of the raid and the search and seizure of documents and property were unsubstantiated.

Our own review of the report confirmed that the AFP members were sensitive in their use of the new powers and alert to their obligations. We provided a detailed explanation to Mr J, who has not raised any further concerns.