Commonwealth Ombudsman logo

Our history

The first Commonwealth Ombudsman, Professor Jack Richardson, was appointed in March 1977. This section contains a general history of the Ombudsman's office in Australia with profiles of each Commonwealth Ombudsman and timelines of legislative changes and responsbilities during their respective periods of office.


Introduction
Australian Administrative Law in the 1960s and 1970s
The Kerr Committee
The Bland and Ellicott Committees
An Australian Ombudsman

Introduction


An ombudsman is an official, usually (but not always) appointed by the government or parliament, who is charged with representing the interests of the public by investigating and addressing complaints reported by individual citizens. The modern meaning arose from its use in Sweden with the Parliamentary Ombudsman instituted in 1809 to safeguard the rights of citizens by establishing a supervisory agency independent of the executive branch. The word ombudsman is not gender specific. Its specific meaning has since been adopted into English as well as other languages, and ombudsmen have been instituted by many other governments and organisations. The origin of the word is found in Old Norse and the word umbuds man, meaning representative. The first preserved use in Swedish is from 1552. It is also used in the other Scandinavian languages such as the Icelandic umboðsmaður, the Norwegian ombudsman and the Danish ombudsmand.

New Zealand became the first English speaking country to appoint an ombudsman in 1962. The office of the United Kingdom Ombudsman was established in 1967.

The first Ombudsman in Australia was appointed in Western Australia in 1971, and was followed by the appointment of an ombudsman in Victoria in 1972, and in Queensland and New South Wales in 1974.

Legislation to establish an office of Commonwealth Ombudsman was enabled in 1976, and the first Commonwealth Ombudsman commenced operation on 1 July 1977.

The concept of the ombudsman as an independent person who can investigate and resolve disputes between citizens and government has spread to over 120 countries and is seen to be an essential accountability mechanism in democratic societies.

[top]

Australian Administrative Law in the 1960s and 1970s


The administrative processes of government were increasingly impacting on Australians during the 1960s and 1970s, but there was no coordinated approach to administrative law reform that could offset the problems created by the new administrative complexity.

Ordinary Australians had no realistic or affordable means to test administrative actions or decisions. Access to redress via the courts – through a judicial review process marked by rigidity and the inherent danger that justice could be denied by a technicality.

A significant point in the development of an Australian Ombudsman was the passage of the Parliamentary Commissioner (Ombudsman) Act through the New Zealand Parliament in 1962.

Three years later, Mr Justice Else-Mitchell, then a member of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, provided the impetus for administrative law reform in Australia when he delivered a paper titled ‘The Place of the Administrative Tribunal in 1965’ at the Third Commonwealth and Empire Law Conference in Sydney.

Between 1968 and 1973, the Federal Government established three committees to examine administrative decision making and review in Australia.

[top]

The Kerr Committee

On 29 October 1968, the Government established the Commonwealth Administrative Review Committee, known as ‘The Kerr Committee’ after its Chairman Sir John Kerr, then a member of the Commonwealth Industrial Court.


On 14 October 1971, the Kerr Committee presented a report recommending the establishment of:

  • a general counsel for grievances (an Ombudsman)
  • an administrative review council
  • an administrative review tribunal
  • a codified judicial review system before a specialist court, and
  • an administrative procedure statute.

The Kerr Committee saw the Ombudsman as a ‘general counsel for grievances’ set in the area of administrative review, rather than in a parliamentary executive situation.

The Kerr Committee suggested that the general counsel for grievances should be associated with a general appeal tribunal and other review institutions.

[top]

The Bland and Ellicott Committees

Following the release of the Kerr Committee’s report, the Government appointed two committees to further examine administrative law reform in Australia, known as the Bland and Ellicott Committees.

On 19 January 1973, the Bland Committee made an interim report proposing the establishment of an Ombudsman’s office.

The Ellicott Committee’s report of 29 May 1973 recommended that the Government should adopt the Kerr Committee’s judicial review proposals, including that the Government should appoint a general counsel for grievances or an ombudsman.

In effect, the Kerr, Bland and Ellicott Committees recognised that the existing avenues of redress for people having problems with administrative actions and decisions were complex, expensive and difficult to access for many Australians.

During his delivery of the second reading speech on the Ombudsman Bill to the House of Representatives in June 1976, Mr Ellicott said that the most important element of the new legislation was that it would provide the citizen with a legitimate complaint about official action with access to an impartial investigator to inquire into the matter.

‘The strength of the ombudsman’s work lies in the independence and impartiality of his investigation’, Mr Ellicott said.

The Commonwealth Parliament passed three major pieces of legislation as the result of the reports by the Kerr, Bland and Ellicott Committees.

These Acts recognise four bodies as elements in a comprehensive structure:

  • the office of Ombudsman established by the Ombudsman Act 1976
  • a general administrative appeal tribunal – the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) established by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
  • a new system of judicial review – introduced by the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
  • a body to monitor and review the new structure – the Administrative Review Council established by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1976.

[top]

An Australian Ombudsman

Before he became Prime Minister in 1972, Gough Whitlam foreshadowed the appointment of an Ombudsman as a ‘guardian of the people’.

The Ombudsman would investigate complaints from members of the public about unjust treatment by government departments and authorities and would report directly to Parliament.

The Whitlam Government introduced the Ombudsman Bill into Commonwealth Parliament in 1975, but it lapsed with the double dissolution of both houses in November 1975.

The Government headed by Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser reintroduced the Ombudsman Bill in June 1976, and in March 1977, the Prime Minister announced the appointment of Professor Jack Richardson as Commonwealth Ombudsman for a seven-year term.

When announcing the appointment of the Ombudsman in the House of Representatives, Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser, said: ‘The establishment of the office is directed towards ensuring the departments and authorities are responsible, adaptive, and sensitive to the needs of citizens’.

Since its establishment, the Ombudsman’s office has received hundreds of thousands of complaints, and made many reports and recommendations to improve public administration.
bullet

Previous Ombudsman

There have been seven Commonweatlh Ombudsman since the establishment of the office in 1977.

bullet

Period of Office

These links provide timelines of legislative changes and responsibilities for each period of office.

[top]